Office of the Proctor
Overview
The Office of the Proctor at SGT University is committed to maintaining a safe, disciplined, and inclusive campus environment. It serves as a central point for addressing student concerns, ensuring compliance with university regulations, and upholding academic and behavioural integrity. The Proctor's Office also plays a pivotal role in promoting student well-being through guidance, conflict resolution, and grievance redressal mechanisms.
Vision
To inculcate discipline among students and to provide free and fair atmosphere for teaching, learning and research.
Mission
• To maintain law and order in the campus.
• To reform and rehabilitate students through mediation, conciliation and
counselling.
• Zero tolerance of indiscipline in the University campus and its maintained
centres.
• To ensure constituent units of the University carry out academic activities
smoothly.
• To foster moral as well as social values amongst students.
• To prevent the students from indulging in any antisocial activities in and around
the campus.
SGT Proctorial committee
Dr Sonia Rathee
Proctor
Dr. Divya Yadav
SGTCOP Member - Secretary
Dr. Vikram Mor
FOSC Deputy Proctor - Non-Med Wing
Ms. Sapna Yadav
FNUR Deputy Proctor - Medical Wing
Dr. Sandeep Kumar
FEDU Deputy Proctor - Non-Med Wing
Dr. Amit Asthana
FEAT Member
Dr. Azad Singh
FLAW Member
Dr. Rajesh Puniya
FCAM Member
Ms. Monika Deswal
FEAT Member, DSW Nominee
Dr. Heenu Dhar
FMHS Member
| Sr. No. | Name | Designation | Mobile No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Sonia Rathee | FCAM Proctor | 9991381333 |
| 2 | Dr. MD. Abu Nasar | FMHS Deputy Proctor - Medical Wing | 9818122010 |
| 3 | Ms. Sapna Yadav | FNUR Deputy Proctor - Medical Wing | 9311323172 |
| 4 | Dr. Vikram Mor | FOSC Deputy Proctor - Non-Med Wing | 9996822404 |
| 5 | Dr. Sandeep Kumar | FEDU Deputy Proctor - Non-Med Wing | 7021139377 |
| 6 | Dr. Henu Dhar | FMHS Member | 7011054541 |
| 7 | Mr. Vijender Kumar | SGTU Member | 7428085480 |
| 8 | Mr. Umesh Kothari | SGTU Member | - |
| 9 | Ms. Monika Deswal | FEAT Member, DSW Nominee | 9466136218 |
| 10 | Dr. Azad Singh | FLAW Member | 8708352488 |
| 11 | Dr. Neelkant Prasad | FPHS Member | 9027169402 |
| 12 | Dr. Rajesh Puniya | FCAM Member | 8699824852 |
| 13 | Dr. Amit Asthana | FEAT Member | 8126271933 |
| 14 | Dr. Divya Yadav | SGTCOP Member - Secretary | 9887204856 |
Proctor’s Office – Roles and Responsibilities
The Proctorial Board at SGT University is constituted under the leadership of the Chief Proctor, who is supported by Deputy Proctors and Board Members. The Chief Proctor heads the Proctor’s Office and is responsible for maintaining discipline, ensuring student welfare, and fostering a safe, respectful, and academically enriching campus environment.
1. Maintenance of Discipline
The primary responsibility of the Proctor’s Office is to ensure that the university environment
remains disciplined,
respectful, and conducive to academic and personal growth. The following points elaborate on the key
functions under
this responsibility:
1.1. Implementation and Enforcement of Discipline at SGT University
1.1.1 The Chief Proctor is responsible for the implementation of the University's officially
approved Code of Conduct,
which outlines the expected standards of behaviour, academic integrity, and ethical practices for
all students.
1.1.2. The Proctor office shall ensure that all students are well-informed about the university’s
rules, regulations,
and disciplinary guidelines.
1.1.3. The Proctor’s Office will actively promote a campus culture rooted in discipline, mutual
respect, and
accountability among the student community.
1.2. Prevention of Misconduct and Management of Campus Disturbances
The Proctor’s Office plays a pivotal role in both the prevention of and response to any form of
student misconduct or
campus disturbance, including:
1.2.1 Misconduct: This includes addressing incidents such as abusive behaviour, verbal or physical
altercations,
substance abuse, acts of defamation, or any conduct that undermines the university’s reputation.
1.2.2 Disturbances: This refers to handling situations such as protests, group conflicts,
unauthorized gatherings, or
any disruptive behaviour that impedes the academic or administrative functioning of the
institution.
2. Maintenance of Decorum During University Events and Functions
The Proctor’s Office shall be responsible for ensuring discipline and orderly conduct during all
official university
events and engagements, including:
2.1. Public Events and Ceremonies: Overseeing the behavior of students and ensuring respectful
participation during
cultural festivals, academic functions, and other student-centric events.
3. Monitoring and Supervision
An essential function of the Proctor’s Office is to ensure vigilant supervision and consistent
monitoring of
disciplinary matters across the university. The Proctor shall lead this effort through structured
coordination and
record-keeping, as outlined below:
3.1. Oversight of Deputy Proctors
The Proctor shall be the chief supervisory authority of the Proctorial Board, which includes Deputy
Proctors and board
members. Responsibilities include:
3.1.1. Delegation of Duties: Assigning responsibilities to Deputy Proctors across departments, and
various academic
activities.
3.1.2. Regular Review: Conducting periodic meetings to review the performance and effectiveness of
the proctorial team
in addressing student discipline issues.
3.1.3. Guidance and Coordination: Providing direction, resolving conflicts, and ensuring that all
proctorial staff are
aligned with university regulations and policies.
4. Monitoring Student Behaviour (On and Off Campus)
The Proctor’s Office shall take proactive measures to monitor student behaviour both within and
beyond the physical
boundaries of the university. This includes:
4.1. Classroom and Campus Surveillance: Ensuring that students maintain decorum during academic
hours, breaks, and in
public areas like libraries, canteens, and common spaces.
4.2. Off-Campus Conduct: Addressing cases where student behaviour off-campus (including Transport,
educational tours,
internships, and social media usage) may impact the reputation or safety of the university
community.
5. Documentation and Record-Keeping of Disciplinary Proceedings
To ensure transparency and procedural integrity, the Proctor office shall maintain a comprehensive
and secure record of
all disciplinary matters. This includes:
5.1. Case Logs: Maintaining detailed reports of incidents, inquiries conducted, witness statements,
and outcomes.
5.2. Confidentiality: Ensuring that sensitive information is handled with strict confidentiality, in
accordance with
university policy and legal provisions.
5.3. Reporting: Preparing periodic reports for submission to the Vice-Chancellor or relevant
disciplinary committees,
summarizing key issues, trends, and recommendations.
6. Coordination and Communication
Effective functioning of the Proctor’s Office requires seamless coordination with academic and
administrative
stakeholders, along with timely communication to address disciplinary concerns. The Proctor serves
as the primary
liaison in all such matters.
6.1. Collaboration with Deans and Heads of Departments
6.1.1. Deans and Heads of Departments (HoDs): Regular interaction with academic leaders to identify
and address student
behavioural concerns arising within classrooms or academic departments.
6.2. Reporting of Major Incidents to University Authorities
6.2.1. Prepare and submit formal incident reports to the Vice-Chancellor, Registrar, or relevant
university authorities.
6.2.2. Include factual details, preliminary inquiry outcomes, and recommended actions or
interventions.
7. Preventive and Awareness Measures
Beyond addressing disciplinary issues reactively, the Proctor’s Office plays a vital preventive and
educational role by
fostering awareness, promoting responsible behaviour, and building a culture of respect and
integrity within the
university community.
7.1. Conduct of Sensitization Programs and Workshops
The Proctor office shall organize regular sensitization initiatives aimed at educating students on
critical issues
affecting campus life. These include:
7.1.1. Discipline and Campus Conduct
7.1.2. Anti-Ragging Awareness activities and events
7.1.3. Gender Equality and Inclusion activities and events
7.1.4. Ethics and Integrity
7.1.5. Caste Discrimination and Social Equity
8. Submission of Periodic Reports to the Vice-Chancellor/Registrar
The Proctor office shall be required to submit detailed quarterly and annual reports to the
Vice-Chancellor or Registrar
summarizing:
8.1 The number and nature of disciplinary cases handled.
8.2. Actions taken and outcomes achieved.
8.3. Preventive programs and awareness activities conducted.
8.4. Status of pending grievances or unresolved complaints.
8.5. Recommendations for policy improvements or structural enhancements.
9. Support Systems and Resources Required
To ensure the effective functioning of the Proctorial system and to enable the Chief Proctor and
associated staff to
carry out their duties efficiently, the following resources and support systems are recommended:
9.1. Dedicated Office Space and Administrative Support Staff: A well-equipped office space for the
Proctor’s Office,
including essential infrastructure like computers, filing systems, and meeting rooms. Additionally,
administrative
support staff will be needed to assist with documentation, record-keeping, report preparation, and
coordination across
departments.
9.2. Proctorial Vehicle (If Necessary for Rapid Response): Depending on the campus size and the
nature of disciplinary
incidents, a dedicated vehicle may be necessary for quick mobility, particularly for rapid response
to off-campus
events, student emergencies, or monitoring situations that may arise in any hours.
9.3. Budget Allocation for Awareness Programs and Training: An annual budget should be allocated for
conducting
awareness programs, workshops, and sensitization sessions on issues such as discipline,
anti-ragging, gender equality,
and ethics.
